namebase造句

• NameBase's mission is similar to ours.
• This will help users to continue using useful NameBase references and links in articles.
• He runs NameBase, a comprehensive database of biographical articles citing thousands of reliable sources.
• The name was created by namebase, based on a fusion of " Print " and " Energy ."
• I don't believe that Brandt's abuse of his sysop powers at NameBase should go unreported.
• Daniel Brandt has nullrouted all links from Wikipedia to NameBase . org in order to encourage the deletion of the NameBase article.
• Daniel Brandt has nullrouted all links from Wikipedia to NameBase . org in order to encourage the deletion of the NameBase article.
• Contrary to Cberlet's claims, my edits were properly sourced to " Ramparts " magazine and NameBase . org.
• Yes, he should be mentioned for what has happened with the entire Seigenthaler controversy, and he should be mentioned with NameBase and / or Google Watch.
• Wikipedia is an encyclopedia accessible to anyone, and NameBase is supposed to be an index of material of interest to investigative journalists and researchers that's accessible to anyone.
• The section on NameBase in the article is so incompetent that it may as well not even be in the article, despite the fact that NameBase has existed for 20 years.
• The section on NameBase in the article is so incompetent that it may as well not even be in the article, despite the fact that NameBase has existed for 20 years.
• Instead of deleting the article Daniel Brandt, we can instead " redirect " it to either NameBase, Google Watch or whatever, and have a relevant bio on Brandt there.
• We merge this info to the subjects we want to cover, then redirect this article somewhere . ( I suggest NameBase, if that is sufficient for an article, otherwise Google Watch.
• Its closure called for the article to be merged to four separate articles : NameBase, Google Watch, Criticism of Wikipedia, and CIA HTTP cookies controversy ( the latter since deleted ).
• To start this, I will be merging the info on NameBase into the NameBase article, and redirecting this there ( and protecting the redirect, out of respect for Brandt's wishes ).
• To start this, I will be merging the info on NameBase into the NameBase article, and redirecting this there ( and protecting the redirect, out of respect for Brandt's wishes ).
• How can we have four articles, Google Watch, Wikipedia Watch, NameBase, and Scroogle, which are all products / projects / whatever of PIR, but claim PIR itself isn't notable?
• :: : : The problem is that whichever you redirect it to will end up contianting an incomplete bio since it would make little seince to mention the google watch stuff on the namebase article and the reverse on the google watch article.
• This would've hampered the work of students and researchers using Wikipedia as a " starting point " in their research if I hadn't used WebCite in order to create archives of those NameBase pages ( e . g . ).