As one of core concepts of bankruptcy law , credit of bankrupt is one of main content that revising work of bankruptcy law need inspect emphatically 作为破产法核心概念之一的破产债权,是破产法修订工作需要重点考察的主要内容。
Where the contract is dissolved according to provisions in proceeding four paragraphs , the counterparts right of claiming damages will the bankruptcy obligatory right 依前四款规定解除合同时,对方当事人请求损害赔偿的权利作为破产债权。
The second part is the scope of the bankruptcy credit , including the principle of definition and category and exception of the bankruptcy credit 第二部分是破产债权的范围,包括破产债权范围的确定原则、破产债权的种类以及破产债权的除外。
The third part is exercising of the bankruptcy credit , including the whole process from the declaration , inquisition and confirm to the discharge 第三部分是破产债权的行使,包括从破产债权申报到破产债权的调查和确认到破产债权的清偿的全过程。
It is n ' t useful to judge of bankruptcy cases and redistribution of social resources . it violates the principle of efficiency seriously ; 3 破产债权申报的规定极其僵化,未区分不同的情况予以不同的处理,不利于社会资源的重新配置,有悖于效率原则; 3
Where the bankruptcy assignee dissolves the contract and the counterpart has already paid a deposit , the right for claiming the deposit will be the bankruptcy obligatory right 破产清算人解除合同,对方当事人已给付定金的,以定金额为限的返还请求权作为破产债权。
The obligatory right of bankruptcy is the one happened before the declaration of bankruptcy . all the obligatory rights should be applied through the legal procedure 破产债权是破产宣告以前成立的债权,债权应当通过法定程序申报,逾期申报将对债权人产生不利的影响。
Concretely speaking , the field of bankruptcy credit is narrow and lagging , distributive sequence of bankruptcy credit is rough , stipulations of report are rigid , stipulations of affirmation 同时在未来的破产立法中,应当明晰破产债权的范围,完善破产债权申报、确认与计算规则,理顺破产债权分配顺序。
Stipulations of affirmation exist contradictory . it confuses powers of people ' s court with powers of bankruptcy creditor ' s meeting and leads to judicial powers " disposition unsuitable 破产债权确认的规定存在矛盾,债权人会议的职权和人民法院的职权发生了混淆,造成了司法权的不当配置,有违法理; 4
It only makes principled stipulations and has n ' t particular stipulations . different credits have n ' t been divided right so that it ca n ' t embody principle of fairness 破产债权的分配顺序比较粗放,在原则性规定之外,没有对有关内容作出具体的规定,不同性质的债权没有能够得到合理的区分,未能体现公平原则。