vandalizm造句

• So, I agree with Nixer's classification of this as vandalizm.
• :The edits he is doing is execly the vandalizm we once complained on.
• And he called my edits vandalizm.
• BigButtBSU was the first member of the ESPN Boise State Broncos board to fully be accepted into Vandalizm.
• The user's talk page has a message requesting any future vandalizm to be reported to abuse reports.
• :: : : : A vandalizm of an object belonging to a certain group is an act of discrimination against that group.
• vandalizm page without so much as a warning or message to myself, passing it off as " garbage " in the edit summary.
• This user talk ) keeps trying to engage me in an edit war in the article Surviving the Game and calling my edits vandalizm.
• Vandalizm occured from the IP on 12 / 06 / 2007, so I guess it's time to notify the ISP, Sprint.
• Did a right fine job of quickly reverting the vandalizm Thanks .  Preceding talk ) 02 : 08, 22 May 2011 ( UTC)
• The sources don't need to literally state that vandalizm of an Armenian cemetery is an anti-Armenian act, because as I understand it is too obvious.
• It seems you don't have enough sysops for fighting against vandalizm, so I would be very glad if you give me the chance to help fighting against vandalizm.
• It seems you don't have enough sysops for fighting against vandalizm, so I would be very glad if you give me the chance to help fighting against vandalizm.
• It could be genuine contributions ( although misguided ) or sneaky vandalizm, so I feel I need another pair of eyes and feedback should there be more edits of that kind.
• This IP user shows no will to constructive cooperation and interest in adding sourced information at all, but is invoved in constant vandalizm, edit warring and deleting of content in the Fenerbah鏴 Galatasaray rivalry.
• I would like request sysop rights, because I fight against vandalizm and that doesen't make any sence without the chance of blocking IPs and protecting pages, for example the pages of blocked IPs.
• Most likely s / he would would tell you, that your edits were not reverts of simple vandalizm, but were " content dispute "-then s / he could point you to how such disputes can be resolved.
• My guess is that probably at least 50 % of these attempts would have been completely stopped, discouraging the prospective vandal from going through all of the trouble of jumping through all of the hoops, before doing the vandalizm.
• I don't see these as serious threats ( everyone has a right to open an arbitration case if they feel an admin has done something wrong ), but they are undoubtedly breaches of civility ( deletion of articles by the proper routes, involving discussion by many other people, does not constitute " vandalizm " ).
• Many of us in the field believe that ADHD is a gift . But changing the title of the newspaper article WAS ABSOLUTELY vandalizm as was adding " who is really IP xxx . xxx . xxx . xxx to clutz's post and the silly little tags designed to trivialize me that are added to all my comments.