umbraco造句

• Research has also been undertaken on running an Umbraco website on Mono on Linux.
• I'm finding it very hard to find independent sources of information about Umbraco.
• Umbraco was developed by Niels Hartvig in 2000 and released as open source software in 2004.
• But the main question is if an entry on umbraco has a place in wikipedia or not.
• MySQL 5.6 . 5 or newer is required to support Umbraco 6.1 or newer.
• For me, there is no question of whether there should be a WikiPedia article on umbraco or not.
• Umbraco 7 featured a completely revamped back-end administration UI, with the use of AngularJS for a single-page application experience.
• As of Umbraco 6, support for MySQL has waned, as the development team has spent more time supporting Microsoft's SQL Server products.
• Given that nobody here seems to be suggesting that articles about less noteworthy CMSs than Umbraco be deleted, I believe this question has a clear answer.
• I feel a bit uncomfortable with a significant part of the article being about figures aiming to show Umbraco is a noteworthy . NET CMS . It is.
• Umbraco can be deployed on a single physical server running the database and web tier, and this deployment model can be appropriate for small low-cost sites.
• So, as far as I am concerned, it is clear that, currently, WikiPedia considers noteworthy CMSs with a market share smaller than umbraco's.
• The Umbraco developer community and it's owner needs to understand that popularity and downloads do not constitute a need or right to an entry on an Encyclopedia.
• As long as none of the above * clearly * applies and an umbraco entry has a place in Wikipedia, effort should be made to make the article better.
• Umbraco sites which serve content under higher load can also be deployed on a NAS or a cluster file system or using a file replication service between nodes in the cluster.
• When trying to prove umbraco is noteworthy, we end up trying to give figures and facts showing that it is one of the important players in the . NET CMS market.
• Unfortunately, it does not feel safe to leave out such figures; we still feel that we need to show umbraco is a notable enough CMS to have an article in Wikipedia about it.
• With Umbraco 4.6, released in 2010, VistaDB support was removed, and replaced with support for SQL Server Express and SQL Server Compact Edition, due to licensing issues with VistaDB's parent company.
• It focused on a clean, simple user interface allowing web developers to build websites from scratch or by customizing open-source web content management systems such as Orchard, DotNetNuke, Umbraco, Joomla !, Drupal and WordPress.
• Those like myself that think the article belongs in Wikipedia have to 1 ) prove Umbraco is noteworthy and 2 ) ensure the language and the kind of information found in the article are appropriate for an article in an encyclopedia, not some marketing brochure.