tortfeasor造句

• In generally , each tortfeasors has same faults and equal responsibilities in joint dangers
  共同危险行为中各行为人一般是过错相同、责任均等
• Joint injuries are several tortfeasors " torts can hurt others on the base of common wilfulness or faults
  有过错联系的共同侵权行为可以分为共同加害行为和非共同加害行为。
• Joint tortfeasors should take on joint liability in principle . joint torts with related faults include joint injuries and non - joint injuries
  共同侵权行为可以分为有过错联系的共同侵权行为和无过错联系的共同侵权行为。
• In joint torts with related faults , respective tortfeasor should take on absolute joint liability ; in joint torts without related faults , respective tortfeasor should take on joint liability that can be excused
  在有过错联系的共同侵权行为中，各行为人承担绝对的连带责任;在无过错联系的共同侵权行为中，各行为人承担可以免责的连带责任。
• Non - joint injuries are several tortfeasors " torts positing to joint injuries that can hurt others on the base of the combination of wilfulness and faults . joint torts without related faults include joint dangers and non - joint dangers
  非共同加害行为是数行为人基于故意和过失的结合致人损害的侵权行为，是与共同加害行为相对应的一种共同浸权行为。
• Liability can be excluded or reduced to such extent as is considered just having regard to the victim ' s contributory fault and to any other matters which would be relevant to establish or reduce liability of the victim if he were the tortfeasor
  在受害人对过错的作用和如果受害人是侵权人等其他影响确定或者减缩受害人责任的相关范围内，责任可被免除或减缩。
• Recently , cases of numerous tortfeasors are common occurrence , whereas the current law of the joint tort is not integrated and systemic in our country , so that the joint tort is one of the parts of the law of tort needed to be discussed
  我们的立法应对共同侵权行为做怎样的规定?司法在共同侵权行为制度的发展中又起了怎样的作用?本文即对这些问题一一进行了探讨。
• Scholars had different views on whether joint tortfeasors should be burdered with joint and several liability when nations belong to civil law system enacted their civid code in 19th century , but legislator affirmed it in general
  19世纪大陆法系国家在制订民法典时对是否应规定共同侵权行为人的连带责任问题，在学者中存在着不同的看法，但立法普遍规定共同侵权人应承担连带责任。
• A18 liability of multiple tortfeasors for indivisible harm if the independent tortious conduct of two or more persons is a legal cause of an indivisible injury ， each person is jointly and severally liable for the recoverable damages caused by the tortious conduct
  如果两个或两个以上的共同侵权行为构成一不可分损害的法律原因，那么每个人均对该侵权行为造成的可获得损害赔偿承担连带责任。
• Where a person is liable for damage done by an auxiliary under article 9 : 101 he is to be treated as bearing the entire share of the responsibility attributable to the auxiliary for the purposes of contribution between him and any tortfeasor other than the auxiliary
  根据第9 ： 101条对辅助者引起的损害承担责任的人，在他和除他的辅助者之外的其他侵权行为人的责任分配关系上，应当被认为承担其辅助者全部责任份额。
• The legal duty of the co - tortfeasors is a legal question concerned with the relation of various main bodies , and links the joint of substantive law with the procedural law , at the same time , is a civil law methodology question that reflects interest measure and legal policy
  摘要共同侵权行为人的法律责任是一个牵涉多方主体之间关系的法律问题，并且关联实体法与程序法的衔接，同时也是一个反映利益衡量和法律政策的民法方法论问题。
• Sticking to the basic animus of tort law , grounding fundamental situation of our country and absorbing foreign useful theoretic productions and legislative experience properly , we relate the essence , types , responsibilities and types of tortfeasors of joint torts together organically . and the combination of them form a new and scientific institution of joint torts corresponding to today ' s social life
  在坚持侵权行为法根本宗旨的前提下，针对我国的基本国情，适当借鉴国外有益的理论成果和立法经验，从共同侵权行为的本质、类型、责任及行为人的种类等方面来入手，将创门有机地统一起来，就构成了新的科学的符合当今社会生活的共同侵权行为制度。
• By investigating the historical development of joint torts , the comparison of several department laws , different demands of instituting joint torts and single tort , legislation and judicatory practice , and analysizing former scholars " wrong cognitions about joint torts , the writer get the essence of joint torts ( the definition of joint torts ) . joint torts mean that several tortfeasors have or do n ' t have joint subjective faults , but either their behaviors and invading consequents or only their invading consequents of respective behaviors are related together objectively and undividedly in same invading event . joint torts include joint torts with related faults and joint torts without related faults
  通过对共同侵权行为的历史发展、几个部门法的比较、共同侵权行为与单独侵权行为的构成的不同要求、立法与司法实践等方面进行考察，分析以往学者对共同侵权行为构成的认识误区，得出共同侵权行为的本质应该是，即共同侵权行为的定义为：共同侵权行为指数行为人具有共同的主观过错，或者没有共同的主观过错，但是数行为人的行为和侵害后果，在同一侵害事件中，客观地联系到了一起，不可分割，或者仅仅是数行为人各自行为的侵害后果，在同一侵害事件中，客观地联系到了一起，不可分割。
• Sometimes the damage to a victim ’ s market share and business credit standing caused by a tortfeasor cannot be compensated by money . in order to refrain timely and effectively a tort which is about to or is implementing , our country , after becoming a member of world trade organization , has taken a series of measure to give judicial protect to intellectual assets among which injunction system is the most important one
  侵权人对受害者的市场份额、商业信誉所造成的损害,有时是无法用金钱来补偿的,为了及时、有效地制止即将发生或正在实施的侵权行为,我国加入wto后,在知识产权司法保护方面采取了一系列措施,其中最重要的一项就是建立了禁令制度。
• The joint liability of joint torts means victims have rights to claim compensations for all loss from anyone or several ones of joint tortfeasors , and anyone of joint tortfeasors all have the liabilities of taking on all compensative responsibilities for victims . if anyone or several ones of joint tortfeasors have compensated all loss of victims , the compensative responsibilities of other tortfeasors should be excused
  共同侵权行为的连带责任是指受害人有权向共同侵权行为人中的任何一人或数人请求赔偿全部损失，而任何一个共同侵权行为人都有义务向受害人负全部的赔偿责任;共同侵权行为人中的一人或数人已全部赔偿了受害人的损失，则免除其他共同侵权行为人向受害人应负的赔偿责任。
• On the basis of two principal functions of the law of tort which are compensation and damage prevention , this thesis aims at discussing what the joint tort is and the civil liability of tortfeasors , and also suggesting to legislate by the way of type to integrate and systematize the law of tort . the paper falls into three parts , as shown in the following : part one : the cognizance of the joint tort base on current laws in china , this part dissertates the cognizance of the joint tort by the way of type after making the quality of it clear
  笔者认为,对于共同侵权行为,不论是在理论研究中还是在立法中, “类型化”的研究方法都要优越于现有的研究方法;对于共同侵权行为人之间的责任分担,则需要根据不同的侵权情况而寻找不同的分担方法;且共同侵权行为制度需要依赖于司法制度的精确分析,因此采用合理的方法,有效的运用司法这一工具,可以更好的实现我们追求正义的目的。