labiovelars造句

• If the labiovelars were just Centum and satem languages : Different realisations.
• The original allophonic distinction was disturbed when the labiovelars were merged with the plain velars.
• If true, it would be the only trace of PIE labiovelars in Balto-Slavic.
• In satem languages, they remained distinct, and the labiovelars merged with the plain velars.
• Greek is especially important for reconstructing labiovelars, as other languages tend to delabialize them in many positions.
• The collapse of the contrast cannot be stated in whole-series terms because the labiovelars do not co-operate.
• The palatals, velars, and labiovelars all remain distinct before front vowels, a conservation found otherwise in Luvian and related Anatolian languages.
• The alternations were somewhat more complicated in verbs containing labiovelars ( hw, kw or gw ), since these underwent further changes in Germanic.
• The centum group of languages, on the other hand, merged the palatovelars with the plain velar series, while the labiovelars were kept distinct.
• The East and Southeast dialects are particularly conservative in that they preserve Proto-Loloish labiovelars; the speakers call themselves the " ".
• While Proto-Tocharian, which places Tocharian in the centum group ( assuming that Proto-Tocharian lost palatovelars while labiovelars were still phonemically distinct ).
• Generally, labiovelars were delabialised and became h, k or g when they stood next to-u-, or were preceded by-un -.
• The satem languages merged the labiovelars with the plain velar series, while the palatovelars became sibilant fricatives or affricates of various types, depending on the individual language.
• It was Brugmann who pointed out that labiovelars had merged into the velars in the satem group, accounting for the coincidence of the discarded non-labialized group with the satem group.
• Analogous to the depalatalization of the satem languages, the centum languages show delabialisation of labiovelars when adjacent to * w ( or its allophone * u ), according to a rule known as the bouk髄os rule.
• It is also asserted that in Sanskrit and Balto-Slavic, in some environments, resonant consonants ( denoted by / R / ) become / iR / after plain velars but / uR / after labiovelars.
• Vowel rounding also resulted from the influence of nearby labiovelars, although this occurred after the Proto-Tocharian period, with differing results in Tocharian A and B, generally with more rounding in Tocharian A ( e . g.
• The reflexes of the labiovelars are generally indistinguishable from those of the plain velars in satem languages, but there are some words where the lost labialization has left a trace, such as by u-coloring a following vowel.
• That produced a new phonemic distinction between palatal and plain velars, with an unpredictable alternation between palatal and plain in related forms of some roots ( those from original plain velars ) but not others ( those from original labiovelars ).
• This applied both to stem-initial and stem-final labiovelars, and could be seen in verbs such as * " kweman
  " " to come ", the-u-of the past participle stem itself triggered the change.