constative造句

• Making meaningful reference within constative discourse is a thoroughly historical skill.
• Margolis inveighs against postmodernists of Rorty s stamp, claiming that they risk disabling constative discourse in their objectivist fears of privilege.
• J . L . Austin introduced the concept of the performative, contrasted in his writing with " constative " ( i . e . descriptive ) utterances.
• Constative discourse  the making of statements of fact  for instance need only rely on identification, and reidentification, of items for it to prove effective in use.
• Having shown that " all " utterances perform actions, even apparently constative ones, Austin famously discarded the distinction between " performative " and " constative " utterances halfway through the lecture series that became the book and replaced it with a three-level framework:
• Having shown that " all " utterances perform actions, even apparently constative ones, Austin famously discarded the distinction between " performative " and " constative " utterances halfway through the lecture series that became the book and replaced it with a three-level framework:
• Based on this distinction of what Austin labeled as constative utterances ( statements that describe, which were the focus of logical positivism ) and performative utterances ( statements that perform or do something ), Austin developed his speech act theory to investigate how we do things with words.
• Therefore, historical memory and consensus, together with a narratizing ability, are all that are necessary to ensure the stability of what we make reference to, there need be nothing essential at all in things themselves, for our constative discourse to be able to flourish and even thrive.
• The paradigmatic case here is speaking the words " I do . " Breaking with analytic philosophy, Austin argued in " How to Do Things With Words " that a " performative utterance " cannot be said to be either true or false, as a constative utterance might be.
• Habermas distinguishes explicitly between factual consensus, i . e . the beliefs that happen to hold in a particular community, and rational consensus, i . e . consensus attained in conditions approximating an " ideal speech situation ", in which inquirers or members of a community suspend or bracket prevailing beliefs and engage in rational discourse aimed at truth and governed by the force of the better argument, under conditions in which all participants in discourse have equal opportunities to engage in constative ( assertions of fact ), normative, and expressive speech acts, and in which discourse is not distorted by the power or the internalization of systematic blocks to communication.