autological造句

• A word's status as autological may change over time.
• Conveniently, the word itself is an isogram in both senses of the word, making it autological.
• The Greek and Latin words ???????? and " dactylus " are themselves dactyls ( and hence autological ).
• The word " yamato kotoba " itself is composed of native Japanese words, and hence is an autological word.
• All adjectives, it would seem, must be either autological or heterological, for each adjective either describes itself, or it doesn't.
• One source of autological words are archetypal words ( ostensive definition )  words chosen to describe a phenomenon by using an example of the phenomenon, which are thus necessarily autological.
• One source of autological words are archetypal words ( ostensive definition )  words chosen to describe a phenomenon by using an example of the phenomenon, which are thus necessarily autological.
• An occasional synonym for " portmanteau word " is " frankenword ", an autological word exemplifying the phenomenon it describes, blending " Frankenstein " and " word ".
• The fame of this paradox later extending also to non-academic circles has created a more widespread popular interest, expressing itself in more recent times also in the creation of lists of autological words.
• Freeing English of the Grelling Nelson paradox entails considerably more modification to the language than mere refinements of the definitions of " autological " and " heterological, " which need not even be in the language for the paradox to arise.
• This is the opposite of the situation for heterological : while " heterological " logically cannot be autological or heterological, " autological " can be either . ( It cannot be both, as the category of autological and heterological cannot overlap .)
• This is the opposite of the situation for heterological : while " heterological " logically cannot be autological or heterological, " autological " can be either . ( It cannot be both, as the category of autological and heterological cannot overlap .)
• This is the opposite of the situation for heterological : while " heterological " logically cannot be autological or heterological, " autological " can be either . ( It cannot be both, as the category of autological and heterological cannot overlap .)
• The sentence is : " " When the singing of a song could be inserted in the plot, " Grand Op閞a " librettists rarely missed an opportunity to provide composers with an excuse for an " autological " use of music " ".
• This sentence takes the word " autological " to be a synonym of " self-referential ", that is singing that is meant to represent actual singing as opposed to singing representing things that do not involve singing in real life ( plot dialogs, monologs, etc . ).
• For example, " neologism " was once an autological word but no longer is; similarly, " protologism " ( a word invented recently by literary theorist Mikhail Epstein ) may or may not lose its autological status depending on whether or not it gains wider usage.
• For example, " neologism " was once an autological word but no longer is; similarly, " protologism " ( a word invented recently by literary theorist Mikhail Epstein ) may or may not lose its autological status depending on whether or not it gains wider usage.
• The paradox can be eliminated, without changing the meaning of " heterological " where it was previously well-defined, by modifying the definition of " heterological " slightly to hold all nonautological words except " heterological . " But " nonautological " is subject to the same paradox, for which this evasion is not applicable because the rules of English uniquely determine its meaning from that of " autological . " A similar slight modification to the definition of " autological " ( such as declaring it false of " nonautological " and its synonyms ) might seem to fix that, but the paradox still obtains for synonyms of " autological " and " heterological " such as " selfdescriptive " and " nonselfdescriptive, " whose meanings also would need adjusting, and the consequences of those adjustments would then need to be pursued, and so on.
• The paradox can be eliminated, without changing the meaning of " heterological " where it was previously well-defined, by modifying the definition of " heterological " slightly to hold all nonautological words except " heterological . " But " nonautological " is subject to the same paradox, for which this evasion is not applicable because the rules of English uniquely determine its meaning from that of " autological . " A similar slight modification to the definition of " autological " ( such as declaring it false of " nonautological " and its synonyms ) might seem to fix that, but the paradox still obtains for synonyms of " autological " and " heterological " such as " selfdescriptive " and " nonselfdescriptive, " whose meanings also would need adjusting, and the consequences of those adjustments would then need to be pursued, and so on.
• The paradox can be eliminated, without changing the meaning of " heterological " where it was previously well-defined, by modifying the definition of " heterological " slightly to hold all nonautological words except " heterological . " But " nonautological " is subject to the same paradox, for which this evasion is not applicable because the rules of English uniquely determine its meaning from that of " autological . " A similar slight modification to the definition of " autological " ( such as declaring it false of " nonautological " and its synonyms ) might seem to fix that, but the paradox still obtains for synonyms of " autological " and " heterological " such as " selfdescriptive " and " nonselfdescriptive, " whose meanings also would need adjusting, and the consequences of those adjustments would then need to be pursued, and so on.