阿多诺

• People get used to defining the cultural identity of new media art according to benjamin ' s mechanical duplication theory and adorno ' s cultural industrial theory
  摘要人们习惯于用本雅明的机械复制理论和阿多诺的文化工业理论定位新媒体艺术的文化身份。
• In this article , we attempt to review the influence of hegel ' s phenomenology of spirit on adorno from a seemingly trivial question in this book
  摘要该文试图从黑格尔《精神现象学》中的一个小问题入手，来探讨这部著作在思想传承上对于阿多诺所具有的意义。
• Adorno ' s critique of culture industry is based on the idea of an egalitarian dialectics between spiritual and material culture , reason and sensibility , mind and impulse
  阿多诺对文化工业的批判，便从精神文化与物质文化、理性与感性、精神与冲动的平等辩证出发。
• Adorno analyzes the critique of culture from two different angles : from the critique of spiritual , leite or high culture and from the critique of material , mass or low culture
  阿多诺的文化分析同时由两种方向进行：一则是针对精神文化、精英文化、雅文化的面向；另则是针对物质文化、大众文化、俗文化的面向。
• One possible way of doing this is to interconnect michel foucault ' s theory of self - cultivation and adorno ' s aesthetic theory , foucault ' s concept of self - creation and adorno ' s concept of the artwork
  切入此问题的一种方式在于连接法国哲学家傅柯的修养论与阿多诺美学理论，即在于傅柯自我创造说与阿多诺艺术作品理论的交错。
• At last , we find that adorno has not only had an insight into hut also criticized the fact that this anti - rational tendency exists deeply in our social lives in the form of astrology
  最后，我们在阿多诺的研究中发现，这种反理性的倾向在当代通过占星术的形式更为貌似合理地深潜在我们的社会生活之中，对此，阿多诺是一个洞悉者和批判者。
• In the third part , the insufficiency of adorno ' s theory on the relationship between mass culture and elegant culture is discussed . the author analyzes the dispute that mass culture and elegant culture is totally opposite . lowenthal treats this problem carefully and contradictorily , it is obvious that adorno ' s view is partial and static because the relationship between them develops with history
  先分析阿多诺关于大众文化与高雅文化完全对立的观点，然后指出洛文塔尔在这问题上的谨慎、矛盾的态度，接着从社会文化历史发展的角度指出二者的关系有一个历史发展过程，因此阿多诺的观点片面性、静止性的不足是很明显的。
• Apart from the introduction and conclusion , this thesis falls into four main parts . in the first part , the author talks about the origin of mass culture adorno only emphasizes the single factor of commercialization . lowenthal retorts adorner ' s view and reveals that adornor ' s consideration on this problem is insufficient
  先剖析阿多诺在现代大众文化产生问题上对文化商业化、市场化单一因素的强调，然后以同属法兰克福学派的洛文塔尔的文化世俗化观点来进行反驳，揭示阿多诺思考的不足。