According to the promises our nation took to enter wto , our country will continue to enlarge the foreign trade and this will lead to economic growth of our country . however , with the internationalization of manufacture and marketing , phenomena that products with defects produced in a country cause consumers " or users " personal damage or property loss in the importing country or a third country increases day by day . since there are many differences between the laws on product responsibility of different country , which will baffle our to develop foreign trade under wto rules as well as protect chinese consumers from products with defects , we must strengthen the research to the laws of product responsibility of other countries , especially the major nations of wto , and coordinate the relation between the law on product responsibility of our country and those of other countries , and , perfect the laws on product responsibility of our country 按照我国加入wto的承诺，我国将进一步扩大对外贸易，这对我国经济增长无疑是一种促进，但随着产品生产和销售的国际化，一国生产的缺陷产品在进口国甚至第三国导致消费者、使用者人身伤害、财产损失的现象也日渐增多，而各国的产品责任法又千差万别，这些法律冲突的存在会阻碍我国在wto规则下发展对外贸易，同时也不利于对我国消费者的保护，因此，我们必须加强对世界各国，尤其是wto主要成员国产品责任法律制度的研究，协调我国与各国产品责任法的关系，完善我国产品责任法律制度。
It consists of eight parts : from part one to part six the following are analysis and studies such as the definition and scope of products both at home and abroad , the definition and norms of judgement of the product defects , the imputation principle of pl , the subject of pl , the pl cause of counterplea , the compensation for damages of pl . etc . in part seven is a brief comparison between responsibility of quote and lawsuit limitation . and a conclusion is drawn from the above seven parts which will gives us some ideas about what we should learn and what will make it perfect for our pl 第一部分至第六部分依次就中外产品责任法中产品的定义和范围、产品缺陷的定义和判断标准、产品责任的归责原则、产品责任主体、产品责任的抗辩事由、产品责任的损害赔偿进行了比较研究并就以上各方面我国产品责任立法必须完善之处分别在各部分进行了阐述；第七部分就产品责任诉讼中的举证责任和诉讼时效进行了简略的比较；结语部分就上述七部分我国产品责任法的可供借鉴之处和完善进行了结论性的综述。
The emergence of strict liability is really a big development in products liability law . strict liability tends to protect consumers " interests in its value goal , but a country shall not only attach great importance to the protection of consumers " interests , but also give consideration to enterprises " interests while making and enforcing its products liability law 严格责任的产生的确是产品责任法的重大发展，它在价值目标上倾向于保护消费者的利益，但一个国家在制定和实施产品责任法时不仅要重视保护消费者的利益，而且也必须歉页企业的利益
This article made a conclusion through the analysis and assessment on the law of contract relief foundation and the right infringement law relief foundation , that the right infringement law relief is more advantageous to realize the goal and the function of information disclosure , we have the reason to choose the right infringement responsibility when situations of responsibility confusing appear 摘要通过将合同法救济基础与侵权法救济基础进行分析评价并得出结论：侵权法救济更有利于实现信息披露的目的和功能，当存在责任竞合的情况时我们更有理由选择的是侵权责任法的适用。
There are still many problems that need to be solved in law , such as uncertainty of product ' s unreasonable dangerous scope , who should be responsible for the damage of products that accord with safety standards , whether to compensate for the damage of the products that are not for sale in circulation or not to do it , approval and imitation of mental compensation , establishment of punitive damage ' s system , etc . the author compared , discussed and analyzed the representative product liability laws of continental law system and anylo ? american law system , and explained product liability laws earlier rules and later legislation , furthermore , refining to some practical experiences and stylistic rules of european ? american product liability laws 本文拟主要采取比较法学的方法对现代英美法系和大陆法系几个主要代表性国家的产品责任法律规范学说进行比较、探讨、分析，并针对产品责任法早期的条例法和后期的立法予以阐释，借鉴欧美产品责任法中某些行之有效的实际经验和体例，分析了我国目前产品责任立法中关于产品、缺陷、损害以及缺陷与损害的因果关系等问题界定和解决中存在问题，进而提出了解决我国产品责任立法现实性与科学性矛盾的立法对策，应当制定专门的产品责任单行法突出其“民法性”特点。
About the expansion standard issue of the punitive damages applicable scope , the author proposes the viewpoint that we may enforce punitive damages to it as long as an illegal activity conforms to the essential elements of punitive damages , implements punitive damages to it can manifest the value of punitive damages , display the functions of punitive damages . the author also applied this viewpoint to analyze particularly , and proposed that the applicable scope expansion of punitive damages should be applied to the following fields of our country : product liability law , environmental law , securities law , copyright protection , vicious medical treatment accidents , the tort liability of harming others deliberately , anti - trust law 关于惩罚性赔偿适用范围扩张的标准问题,笔者提出一违法行为只要符合惩罚性赔偿的构成要件,对其实施惩罚性赔偿能够体现惩罚性赔偿的价值,发挥惩罚性赔偿的功能,就可以对其施以惩罚性赔偿的观点,并运用这一观点具体分析应将惩罚性赔偿扩张适用到我国的产品责任法、环境法、证券法、著作权保护、恶性医疗事故、故意伤害他人的侵权责任、反垄断法等领域。
On the base of it , the author put forward legislative countermeasure to solve the contradiction between science and practise of our country " s legislation of product duty " s law that should legislate spe - cialized product duty ' s separate law with the characters of civil law 同时在立法的内容上提出应将产品定义应界定为“经过加工制作并用于流通的产品… … ”精神赔偿、惩罚性赔偿制度建立的必要及可行性。着重对产品责任法体系的构造和内容提出一些思考，以期对产品责任法的健全和完善有所裨益。
This paper put forward a definition for product and discussed the feasibil - ities and necessities of building of mental compensative system and puni - tive damage system , espeually talked about the construction and content of product duty " s law system . the author hopes that could become exfensive consistence to perfect product duty ' s law 本文除前言和结论外，共分三部分，即：一、产品责任理论的历史发展二、我国产品责任法中几个理论问题的评析三、完善我国现行产品责任制度若干问题的思考与建议
But in the modern society , consumers limited by their characteristics ca n ' t match with the traders who have enough resources , financial power , so only enough economic benefits can stimulate the consumer progressively to take part in the activity against the false commodity producing which is bad for our nation , society and business enterprise 因此必须有足够的经济利益驱动，才能刺激消费者积极地参与到与国家、社会乃至企业长远利益攸关的打假治假活动中来，为此，有必要在产品责任法中建立与我国国情相适应，并具操作性的惩罚性损害赔偿制度。
This paper is aimed to solve the problems in product responsibility issues appears after p . r . c entered wto . we first discussed the basic theories of product responsibility , then with methods of correlative theories " and comparing analysis , we compared and analyzed the product responsibility laws of the major countries of the ocean legalism system and the continent legalism system . finally , we described the present situation of product responsibility laws of our country , presented defects of them and provided suggestions to improve them 在此基础上，运用相关理论和比较分析的方法，对英美法系和大陆法系主要国家的产品责任法律制度进行了分析，对比各主要国家的产品责任法律制度，阐述我国产品责任法律制度的现状，找出我国产品责任法存在的缺陷，为完善我国产品责任法律制度提出建议。
