诉讼程序的

• The author , on the basis of summarizing and analyzing the research in the world , makes clear of the applicable scale of small claims procedure , common procedure and summary procedure in the settlement of people ' s petty right
  笔者在总结分析国内外已有的研究成果的基础上，通过分析小额诉讼程序的内涵与外延，界定小额诉讼程序与我国现有的普通程序以及简易程序在解决人们微小权益纠纷方面的适用范围。
• In section one , the research method to second instance procedure was introduced and analysed , and the method applied in the text was defined . it follows that the value basis to construct second instance procedure is expounded and proved
  在第一节中，先对第二审程序的研究方法进行了分析介绍，确定了本文所选定的研究方法；其次分析论证了建构第二审程序的价值基础，认为第二审程序存在的根据在于诉讼程序的效益价值和效率价值。
• On this ground the author analyzes the basic theories of the small claims procedure , compares other counties ’ relevant institution and puts forward the legislative suggestions to the establishment of our country ’ s small claims procedure . this thesis is constituted by the preface , text and conclusion
  鉴于此,本文从对小额诉讼程序基本理论的探讨出发,结合对国外相关制度的比较和借鉴,对我国小额诉讼程序的构建提出自己的设想。
• Chapter four gives a theoretical and legal explanation on the basis of role of sras , it also gives the answer to the question : why we should have the sras , law needs conception and also the concrete system under it chapter five stresses on the research of sras , it discusses the suitable plaintiff principle , just to identify the plaintiff in the sras , including in what circumstance could have the right of prosecution , to make what policy for the sras
  这种诉讼程序的障碍，大大限制了少数股东在受到欺压时寻求法律保护的机会和途径，为此，西方国家的公司法在时间中逐步创造了一种特殊的诉讼形式?股东代表诉讼，以消除这种不合理的诉讼障碍。通过对股东代表诉讼制度严格的分析，指明了其存在的现实意义。
• It provides a general description about the action reconciliation in germany , france , japan , britain and the u . s . after the comparison and contrast of the case compromise in the two legal systems , the paper concludes that there has been three distinctive features , which includes the means of connections in lawsuit transaction and civil proceedings , the roles the judges play and the varieties of the completing of action arrangement
  文章对德国、法国、日本、英国和美国的诉讼和解制度做了概括的介绍,在此基础上对两大法系的诉讼和解制度进行了比较,总结出三个方面的不同特征:和解和诉讼程序的联系方式不同,法官扮演的角色不同,诉讼和解终结纠纷的样态不同。
• The thesis intent to begin with the litigation benefits and go on discussing the justice of procedure in the civil procedure through the methods such as analysis and authentic proof , vertical and horizontal comparing proof and exploring the interior value of jurisprudence
  为此介绍了诉讼与效益、诉讼与公正之间的关系。第二章从理论上分析了诉讼程序的价值取向? ?追求诉讼效益、达到程序公正并介绍了从诉讼效益的角度探讨程序公正的最有代表性的学说? ?经济效益主义程序价值理论。
• However any clause in substantive law always manifests as the general normative proposition , its content shall be manifested in the mean of one by one specific treatment of cases , the content and value of substantive law can gradually formed in the structure of general normative proposition merely upon the proceedings of contentious procedure
  然而任何实体法的条文总表现为一般的规范命题，而其内容必须借助、通过一个个具体的案件处理才能显示出来，实体法的内容、价值必须通过诉讼程序的进行，才能在一般规范命题框架内逐渐形成。
• And , the author considers the theoretical basis and realistic basis of setting up small claims procedure and puts forward a series of concrete measures and opinions on how to set up small claims procedure . in the current realistic surroundings and institution surroundings . so as to give some reference for the settlement of people ' s petty right disputes , and protect them in a higher degree
  并且，思考了设置小额诉讼程序的理论性基础和现实性基础，提出了在我国当前的现实环境以及制度环境下设置小额诉讼程序的一系列具体构想与建议，以期对现实社会生活中人们的微小权益纠纷解决有所裨益，从而在更大程度上保障人们的民事权益。
• There are four parts in the text : in the first part , the author introduces the established background of the small claims procedure and points out that the produce of this procedure is not only the result of the development trend that simplifies continuously of the civil procedure , but also the response on the system of the development of the rule of law , the progress of the law theories and the increasing of the right claim
  本文的正文共分四部分:第一部分首先介绍了小额诉讼程序产生的背景,指出这一程序的出现既是由民事诉讼程序不断简化的发展趋势所决定的;又是现代社会法治昌明、法学理论渐趋完善和权利诉求日益增多的时代背景对传统诉讼程序的挑战在制度上的回应。
• The ultra time takes into custody exists to the reconnaissance , the prosecution , trial each stage , is in our country judicature practice big stubborn illness , its existence seriously encroached has been taken into custody person ' s legitimate rights and interests , hindered the criminal judicature to be fair and the efficiency
  在刑事诉讼中,使犯罪嫌疑人、被告人处于被羁押的状态,可以保证诉讼程序的顺利进行,有利于打击犯罪。但是在我国司法实践中,超过法律规定期限继续羁押犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的现象日趋严重,受到社会各界的普遍关注。