This article is mainly a discussion on the spiritual damage compensation for close relatives of victim under the situations of damage to right of life , damage to the right of health and damage to the right of personality of the dead , which is based on an introduction and comparison of the concerned foreign legal regulations and academic theories and in combination with the legal practice in china wherefore the author put forwards his own ideas as following : first , under the condition that there is a distance of time between inj ury and death , the close relatives of the dead shall inherit the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation of the dead for the suffering before his death , in addition to their own intrinsic right of claim for spiritual damage compensation ; the second , under the condition that the inflictor has caused the disablement of the sufferer or serious damage to his health , the close relative in a limited cycle of the sufferer should be granted with the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation , which is confirmed in law and becomes a practice in foreign countries ; the third , since the aim of the law to protect the personality of the dead from infringement is to protect the benefits of the close relatives of the dead and to maintain public benefits , is constituted on the personality of the dead the close relative of the dead may initial legal proceeding for spiritual damage compensation 本文重点探讨的就是公民生命权受到侵害、健康权受到侵害、 “死者人格”受到侵害这三种情形下的受害人近亲属的精神损害赔偿请求权问题。探讨以介绍和比较国外相关法律规定和学术理论为前提，结合我国的实际情况，从理论与实践相结合的角度对以上各问题分别进行了分析，并提出了作者自己的一些见解：第一、在公民从受伤害到死亡有一段时间距离的情形下，死者的近亲属除依法享有其固有的精神损害赔偿请求权以外，还可以继承死者生前就其所受之精神损害而享有的精神损害赔偿请求权；第二、在加害人的行为已造成直接受害人残疾，或者是造成其健康严重受损的其他后果的情形下，我国应在借鉴国外已有立法和判例的基础上，赋予一定范围内的受害人近亲属以精神损害赔偿请求权；第三、法律保护死者人格不受侵害的目的是为了保护死者近亲属的利益和维护公共利益，一般情形下，只要死者近亲属能证明其诉讼主体的合法性，能够证实侵害“死者人格”的行为已构成侵权，即可推定死者近亲属因此而遭受了精神痛苦? ?无须举证的“名义上的精神损害” ，死者近亲属即可提起精神损害赔偿之诉。最后，本文认为，加强对受害人近亲属的权利和利益保护问题的研究，既有一定的必要性，同时又具有十分重要的现实意义。
The system of protecting the right of life has been established at present in our country , but along with society ' s development , some concrete systems could not adapt society ' s progress . death compensation question itself is a contradictory aggregate , we should think about both faire and efficiency when we discuss this question 但是,我国现行的法律规范关于生命权的保护存在一定的疏漏,致使实践中很多问题不能得到很好的解决,如死亡赔偿整体数额偏低、分配体制不畅、存在不合理的城乡差别和地域差别等等。
As to the outcome of damage in the medical malpractice , the author thinks it should comprise of the following contents - . the damage of patient ' s right of life , health and body , the damage of rights of property to the patient and its close relatives , and the damage of the patient ' s reputation , privacy and its close relatives * moral damages 对于医疗事故的损害后果，笔者认为主要包括如下几项内容:对患者的生命权、健康权、身体权的损害;对患者及其近亲属的财产权的损害;对病人及其近亲属的精神损害;对患者的名誉权、隐私权的损害。
( 3 ) continuous mental suffering , compensates for which is to offer other comfort to make up the loss of aggrieved party . so factors that affect consequence of tort and infringer ' s attitude are important in determination of compensation . the third part of the article analyses the factors influence the determination of mental injury compensation 的认错态度和受害人的谅解情况，在侵害生命权的慰抚金赔偿中，还应考虑受害人近亲属与死者之间亲属关系的亲疏，在侵害监护权的精神损害赔偿中，还应考虑监护人与被监护人之间亲属关系的亲
