And criminal proceedings as a show evidence of the necessary pre - trial procedures and mechanisms , and it is an integral part of the mechanism , britain is concerned , the adversarial criminal trial as an important model system is to protect the adversarial trial process fair and efficient 目前,随着我国司法改革的日益深化,对抗制审判方式已经基本确立,但与之配套的证据展示制度却始终没有建立起来,司法实践也因此陷入了两难境地。
China revised the law of criminal procedure in 1996 , which processed a little big reformation to the original criminal procedure system by absorbing and borrowing some effective procedures of the law system of the great britain and the usa . on the aspect of criminal justice , the justice method is from the original way of interrogation that is dominated by judge , to the present counterplot system that is dominated by both accusing party and accused party on lawcourt . this kind of inquire method on the lawcourt shall be more beneficial to protect the right of accused party and has the promoting function to realize the fair of justice 我国1996年修订的《刑事诉讼法》 ，对原来的刑事诉讼制度进行了较大的改革，在某些方面借鉴和吸收了英美法系国家有益的做法，表现在刑事审判方式上，就是从以前由法官主导的审问制向由控辩双方主导的对抗制进行转变，对抗制的庭审方式应该更加有利于保障被告人的诉讼权利，对实现司法公正起到促进作用。
Chapter one : introduction the author discuses the different definitions of the exclusionary rules , the background of its establishment ( at the early stage there was only the exclusionary rule on evidence obtained with the means violating the 4th amendment of the us constitution ) , studies the functions of different branches of the american government in establishing and implementing the rules . finally , the author analyses the connection between the rules and adversary model of criminal justice system 首先探讨了对非法证据排除规则若干概念的理解；然后考察了产生非法证据排除规则历史的背景；再阐述了美国政府各部门在非法证据排除规则中的作用；最后分析了非法证据排除规则与对抗制的诉讼模式之关系和美国刑事司法中非法证据排除规则的局限性。
Besides , regarding justice of the procedure as the ideal , the theory of the parties " burden of proof and adversary system as the foundation , and also by analyzing the nature and characteristics of the right to appraise , judicial appraisal and expert ' s conclusion , the author has pointed out that the status of experts in litigation should be parties " witness , on which the author has analyzed the expert ' s legal characteristics that an expert is a natural person with ability to appraise , entrusted with participation in litigation by the parties 同时，笔者以程序正义为理念，以当事人的证明责任和对抗制为理论基础，通过对鉴定权、司法鉴定和鉴定结论的性质及特征的分析，指出了鉴定人的诉讼地位应为当事人的证人，并在此基础上分析了鉴定人的法律特征为由当事人委托而参加诉讼的、具有鉴定能力的自然人。
With the ways of our countrys criminal litigation court trials changing from inquisitorial proceedings to adversary procedures and the progressing of the criminal jurisdiction reformation , discovery is becoming an unavoidable issue in criminal litigation in our country . in practice , many jurisdictional authorities in our country have tried to explore and try it since 1999 . this article , through comparing the discovery system among britain , america and japan , through analyzing the present actual situation of our countrys criminal litigation and from the aspects of the litigation modes , jurisdiction justice and the necessity for deepening the reformation of criminal trials , has proved that it is necessary and emergent in practice and applicable in theory to establish the discovery regime in our country 随着我国刑事诉讼法庭审判方式由审问制向对抗制的转变和刑事审判方式改革的进一步深化，证据展示便成为刑事诉讼中的一个不可回避的问题，实践中不少司法机关从1999年始即已进行了证据展示的探索和尝试，本文从英美日国家的证据展示制度的规定和比较入手，通过对我国刑事诉讼运作现状的分析，从刑事诉讼模式、诉讼公正价值观和深化刑事审判方式改革的角度，论证了证据展示制度在我国的建立具有现实上的必要性、紧迫性和理论上的合理性，并在此基础上对证据展示的主体、责任、内容作了理论上的探讨研究。
With the system of criminal trial in china is being changed from inquisitional into adversary , to perfect discovery system has become an urgent problem to be solved therefore , this article explores rule of corroboration in rule of evidence and is to benefit legislation and practice 随着我国刑事庭审方式由法官主导的审问制向控辩双方的对抗制的转变，完善证据规则已经成为我国刑事诉讼中亟待解决的问题。故此，本文就证据规则中的补强证据规则进行了探讨，以资有益于立法和实践。
