Firstly , this paper makes clear the meaning of stock markets " efficiency through different perspectives , and then introduces the efficient market hypothesis ( emh ) and fractal market hypothesis ( fmh ) . as one important part of rational anticipation theory , emh is the foundation of capital market theories , but the linear paradigm of emh does not conform to the stock market realities 其基本的研究思路是：以有效市场假说和分形市场假说为理论基础，结合中国股票市场的现实情况(中国股票市场收益率不符合正态分布，市场属于分形结构) ，以分形统计学的相关方法为手段，对我国沪、深两市的有效性进行实证检验，力图对中国股票市场的有效性做出客观真实的评价。
The paper presents a computer simulation model to simulate the port operation system , it fully considers all kinds of random factors , through visualized operating management system , it makes easy to arrange ship , load and unload ship and facilities allocation , etc . it can truly reflect the working conditions of the port 本论文建立的系统仿真模型，充分考虑了各种随机因素的影响，通过可视化的作业管理系统，使得船舶配载、装船卸船、装卸设备调度管理等变得简单易行，比较客观真实的反映了港口实际生产状况，具有一定的理论和实用价值。
In the law circle , some scholars who uphold the objective truth doctrine unilaterally emphasize the complete matching between the adjudicative facts and the objective facts , meanwhile some others who insist the legal truth doctrine unilaterally emphasize the matching between the adjudicative facts and the normative facts 理论界一些主张裁判事实“客观真实说”的学者往往片面强调裁判事实与客观事实的完全竞合，而一些主张“法律真实说”的学者则往往片面强调裁判事实与规范事实的竞合。
Three litigation certified concepts have their own background , through the comparative analysis among formal true concept , external true concept and legal true concept , it is clearly testified that formal true concept only has half sense , and cannot satisfies the requirement of modern litigation , therefore it cannot be the concept of modern litigated certification . the main defects of formal true concept are replacing reality by ideality , magnifying the cognition ability of lawsuit truth of human beings , violating the requirement of program value concept , and blocking the development of the modern judicatory reformation . legal true concept dose not exclude the formal true concept , and it a ccords with the cognition relativism , litigation certified relativism and program value concept , therefore , it can be the directive litigation certified concept of china ' s judicatory reformation 诉讼证明标准理论研究应从证明标准理念、证明诉讼的法律规定和证明标准的现实把握三个层面进行，诉讼证明标准理念包括形式真实理念、法律真实理念和客观真实理念，三种诉讼证明理念各有其形成的时代背景，通过对形式真实理念、客观真实理念和法律真实理念全面的比较分析，可以清晰明了地证明，形式真实理念充其量具有半理性的特征，不能满足现代诉讼的要求，因而不可能作为现代诉讼证明理念；客观真实理念存在的主要缺陷是用理想代替现实，夸大了人对案件事实的认识能力，违背了程序价值理论的要求，与目前的司法改革的价值取向发生冲突，阻碍了当前司法改革的进程；法律真实理念并不排斥客观真实理念，符合认识相对论、诉讼证明相对论和程序价值理论，因此应作为指导我国司法改革的诉讼证明理念。
Judges should make efforts to realize justice in law , taking procedural justice and substantial justice as same important , endeavoring to realize the doctrine of factuality , trying hard to realize the substantial justice through procedural justice . judges should have profound knowledge in the theory of laws , adept knowledge in law , common way of thinking of homogeneity , abundant social experience and deep humanistic consideration , and noble morality . judges should adjudicate case in neutral capacity , not being influenced by unfair influence , interference and controlling , and should intervene disputes there still exist lots of problems in the present situation of professional judges in accordance with the requirements of professionlization of judges 职业化的法官，应有崇高的法律信仰，法律是法官的最高权威和唯一上司，法官只忠实于法律，服务于法律；应有共同的价值追求，把保护个体权利作为裁判遵循的首要价值，努力通过法律实现正义，把程序正义和实体正义作为同等重要的价值对待，并努力使法律真实接近客观真实，力求通过程序正义实现实体正义；应具有丰富的法学理论知识，娴熟的法律专业知识，同质化的共同思维形式，丰富的阅历，深切的人文关怀和崇高的职业道德修养；法官应以中立裁判者的身份，具有真正的审理权和裁决权，而不受任何不正当的影响、干预或控制，不主动介入纠纷和争议。
An issue heatedly debated around the academic sphere is the one that what can we find out through proceedings . however broad is the gap between objective truth and legal truth , they share a common standpoint , the case ruled embraces substantial contents which really took place in society . and those empirical things are beyond every observer , including the judge 但是无论是“客观真实”论者，还是“法律真实”论者之间的对立有多么大，他们都肯认一个共同的前提：被提交审理的案件是在社会中实实在在的发生了的，这个对象是超越了任何包括法官在内的观察者。
It is the inevitable extension of the demand of rules by law in the field of criminal suit . in theory , viewers of objective reality ignore the dialectics of cognition and the internal value of procedure itself . its essence is a kind of theory of procedural instrumentalism , which is intolerable for the demand of rules by law 法律真实论是相对真实与程序公正的有机统一，是一种高扬程序正义价值之旗帜的事实认定主张，是法治要求在刑事诉讼领域的必然延伸；客观真实论在理论上忽视了认识论的辩证法和程序自身的内在价值，其实质是一种程序工具主义理论，其与法治的要求是不相容的。
