鉴定制度

• Our current expert testimony system always is the result of natural economy , it include too much the departments concerned , which on the one hand , excessively wastes resource , on the other hand , increase the costs , reduce efficiency and play for time of legal proceedings
  我国现行的刑事司法鉴定制度存在着许多弊端,与司法改革的目标价值取向还存在着较大距离。历史的积淀、法律的滞后、利益的挚肘,无疑影响了刑事司法鉴定体制改革的进程。
• An identifier is a central person in the act of identification who plays a more and more important role in the act of action as the subject of providing evidence . through rethinking the defects of the system of judicial identification in our country and chaos resulting from the system of current judicial identification , the article analyzes and compares the difference of the relative system of judicial identification in the countries of two legal families , probes how to improve legislation and establish unified , independent , new system of judicial identification , starting from specific practice of our country ; how to establish scientificly the basic systems of status of action , qualification , commission , rights and duties , legal burdens and bearing witness in a
  司法鉴定人是鉴定活动的中心人物，作为提供科学证据的主体在诉讼活动中发挥着越来越重要的作用，通过反思我国司法鉴定制度的缺陷和现行司法鉴定体制导致的混乱现状，比较分析两大法系国家司法鉴定有关制度的差异，探求如何从我国具体实际出发，完善立法，建构我国统一的司法鉴定新体制和建立独立、统一的司法鉴定体系；如何科学确立我国司法鉴定人的诉讼地位、资格、委托、权利与义务、法律责任以及出庭作证等基本制度。
• Section 5 , establish the audit technique the committee to make to order the degree . first , establish the independence audit appraisal personal name volume the system settle the person with the concrete case three squares choose a system . again , establish the audit appraisal to settle the standard
  第五节，建立审计技术鉴定制度:首先，建立审计鉴定委的必要性;其次，建立独立的审计鉴定人名册制度和具体案件的鉴定人三方选任制度;再次，设立审计鉴定标准;最后，审计鉴定委的运作。
• The third part briefly reviews the expert opinion currently in operation in our country , and analyzes the present situation and deficiency , its necessity , feasibility of setting up a witness expert system and finally proposes that we should learn from common law countries to set up such an expert opinion system as the expert testimony paralleling with the expert conclusion . the last part puts forward some legislation suggestions for setting up and perfecting the expert witness system based on the facts in our country
  在第三部分，就我国现行立法对专家意见的相关规定进行了回顾并对我国鉴定制度的现状和缺陷、建立专家证人制度的必要性和可行性进行了分析，认为我国应当借鉴英美国家的经验与教训,确立专家证言和鉴定结论并行的专家意见制度，在本文的最后一部分，结合当前实际对我国专家证人制度的确立和完善提出了一定的立法设想。
• The second part will analyze a certain number of issues which exist in our current administer justice identification institution comprehensively , including several main disadvantages under current institution , such as the deluge in artificial distinguish identification potency , multiple identification and repetitive identification , dependence in identification , identifiers " avoidance of the obligation to appear in court to give evidence , not making the identification conclusion known to the public , the identification procedures " innormality , the chaos of the identification startup subject and lacking identification liability mechanism
  第二部分全面剖析我国现行司法鉴定制度存在的若干问题，分析了包括人为区分鉴定效力、多头鉴定和重复鉴定泛滥、鉴定职能不独立、鉴定人普遍回避出庭作证义务、鉴定结论不公开、鉴定程序不规范、鉴定启动主体角色混乱以及鉴定责任机制缺乏等现行制度下的主要弊端。并认为对这些问题，绝不能机械、片面地作评价，必须结合司法鉴定的基本性质去分析，才能找其背后之深层次原因，从而为改革方案的合理设计和选择提供正确指导。
• Because of the specialty of the medical industry , the problem of self - protectionism has been a very tough problem in the appraisal of the medical accidents for a long time , which affecting the public confidence in the results of the appraisal of the medical accidents , making people doubt the scientism , objectivity and the justness of the appraisal system
  长期以来,由于医疗行业自身的特殊性,医疗事故鉴定制度中“行业自我保护”问题已经成为的一个痼疾,严重影响了其社会公信力,使社会各界对其科学性、客观性和公正性产生怀疑。
• This article analyzes the appraisal system of the medical systems from the point of the procedure law , and the conflicts and contrary of the two . furthermore , the author puts forward some solutions and suggestions of how to solving the problem , making it links to with the civil procedure this article is composed of three parts : the preface , the text and the conclusion
  本文试从诉讼法学角度剖析我国现行医疗事故鉴定制度,分析它们与民事诉讼相关规定相互冲突、相互矛盾的几个方面,提出解决问题的一些思路和方案,使其与民事诉讼制度进一步衔接,实现其“一鉴多用”功能。
• In this part , the author makes an analysis of litigant authorized expert system and judge authorized expert system , putting forward that judge authorized expert should be established with litigant authorized expert system supplemented . part vi . a compared study on rights and obligations of expert
  本部分主要分析了英美法系国家的当事人委托鉴定制度和大陆法系国家的司法官委托鉴定制度，并结合我国诉讼制度，提出在我国应建立司法机关委托鉴定为主，当事人委托鉴定为补充的制度。
• The difference of litigation model between two families of law makes a distinction between expert witness and lay witness in the fields of service target , dispatch , impanel and nature standing in litigation ; the second chapter of article surveys the problems arising from expert system practice and actual application of expert witness in judicial practice , and demonstrates the existing condition and necessity of setting up expert witness in our country ; the third chapter of article builds up them in the regards of subject of expert witness , qualification , launch , impanel and adoption of expert ’ comments
  而两大法系诉讼模式的差异,使专家证人与鉴定人在服务对象、启动和选任以及在诉讼中的性质地位上存在较大的区别;本文第二章考察我国鉴定制度在运行过程中产生的问题和专家证人在司法实践中实际运用,论证我国确立专家证人存在的现实基础和必要性;本文第三章,从专家证人的主体、资格、启动和选任及专家意见的可采性等方面进行了构建。