On possible criminal attempt and impossible criminal attempt , three aspects are discussed . primarily , the category and name of possible criminal attempt ; secondly , the basis of bearing the criminal responsibility for impossible criminal attempt ; thirdly , whether the extent of injury is different between the impossible criminal attempt and superstitious offense 关于能犯未遂与不能犯未遂，主要论述了，一是能犯未遂的种类和名称；二是不能犯未遂应刑事责任的根据；三是不能犯未遂与迷信犯的危害程度有无不同。
This paper compares the legal regulations concerning the applicable conditions and the recognition of the crime and proposes : ( 1 ) the prerequisites should be extended to include the acts of robbery . snatch , and deception ; ( 2 ) the " violence " as an objective condition should be interpreted as the violent and forcing actions in robbery , while " on site " should be the site of the stealing , deception , or snatch , or the area involved in the crime with the site as the center ; ( 3 ) the connotation of the subjective condition " harboring the stolen goods , resisting an - eat , destroying criminal evidence " needs expansion ; ( 4 ) dual criteria should be adopted emphasizing on both the act and the consequence in distinguishing the completed crime and the criminal attempt ; and ( 5 ) in case of overlap of law and imaginary concurrence of crimes only by convicting the crime as theft , snatch , and deception can it be regarded as transformed robbery 本文通过比较不同国家该罪的有关法律规定，对我国转化型抢劫罪的适用条件及法律认定问题进行分析，认为： ( 1 )前提条件应扩展为实施盗窃、抢夺、诈骗行为； ( 2 )客观条件中“暴力”应与抢劫罪中的暴力与胁迫行为作同样理解， “当场”应是实施盗窃、诈骗、抢夺行为的当场或以犯罪现场为中心、与犯罪分子活动有关的范围； ( 3 )主观条件中“窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕、毁灭罪证”的内涵应有所延伸； ( 4 )既遂与未遂的判定应采用既主张行为又注意结果的双重标准； ( 5 )在想象竞合或法条竞合时只有以盗窃、抢夺、诈骗罪论处方可转化为抢劫罪。
The special points of our country ' s legislation - fixed nature and fixed quantity decide we must make sure that we should discuss from the aspect of " it ought to be " or " it is " when we research the accomplishment and attempt of a crime , or else , the research achievement from foreign countries may be not suitable in our country 我国立法既定性又定量的特点决定了我们在讨论既未遂的问题时，必须确定我们是在应然层面还是实然层面进行讨论这一前提，否则，国外相关的研究成果搬到我国后，可能就是南橘北积。
Elaborate the dividing line of the accomplished offence and not accomplished offence ; dividing line of this crime and other crime , consist of this crime and crime of manufacture and sale fake bad product , the dividing line of the crime and the crime of defrauding ; the dividing line of one crime and several crimes and the indentify of gang crime 阐述了本罪的既遂和未遂的界限；本罪和他罪的界限，包括和生产、销售伪劣产品罪，诈骗罪的界限；一罪和数罪的界限以及共同犯罪的认定。第四部分，假冒注册商标权罪的刑罚适用。
The subjective aspect of instigation is " to have the intention to instigate someone to commit a crime " , namely the intention of instigation . the awareness factor of instigation means recognizing the instigatee ' s liability , the instigatee ' s lacking criminal intention and the instigating action ' s possibility to cause the instigatee to commit a crime . the will factor of instigation includes the attitude towards the instigatee ' s committing the crime and the attitude towards the harmful consequences brought by the crime instigated to committed , both of 教唆犯的意识因素包括对被教唆人刑事责任能力的认识，对被教唆人原先没有犯罪意图的认识，以及对自己行为将使被教唆人产生犯罪意图并实施该犯罪的认识;教唆犯的意志因素包括其对被教唆人实施被教唆的犯罪的态度及对被教唆人接受教唆实施犯罪造成的危害结果的态度，这两种态度都既可能是希望，也可能是放任;对于为陷害他人而教唆他人实施只能达于未遂的犯罪的教唆行为，在目前的情形下，应依教唆犯处理， .但若刑法对此类行为予以明确规定，尤其是在刑法分则中将其规定为独立的罪名，则更为可取。
The mean differences between them are whether the conduct is dangerous . the dangerousness of the offender ’ s act is subject to both common social knowledge and consistency between knowledge and fact . it should be regarded as attempted crime if acts committed by the offender is harmful , otherwise , not the crime 不可罚之不能犯与不能犯未遂的关系属罪与非罪的关系,二者差异之处关键在于行为是否具有危险性,判断危险性应以行为时行为人认识到的以及一般人可能认识到的事实作为判断资料,以科学上的一般人的认识经验(往往依靠事后鉴定)为判断标准,判断“危险”的有无。
