When choosing college speciality , one of the major tasks is to understand own dominance aptitude , this essay with a brief overview of gardner ' s intelligence pluralism , sternbetg ' s intelligence theory and gatb . the purpose of present study is to develop the speciality ability scale for university students 为了帮助学生更好地了解自己的能力倾向优势，为其大学专业选择时提供一些科学有效的指导，本研究借鉴gardner的智力多元论、 sternberg的智力三分理论、 gatb等对能力结构的论述，依据访谈资料和学生开放式问卷调查的结果，编制出“大学生专业能力问卷”作为研究工具。
Part four , based on the opinions of two famous pluralists - - - - - - weber and davidson , at the dimension of analytic philosophy , i give a new advice on unifying these three approaches and to explicate the rationality of my advice . in part five , i briefly narrate my thought of explanation in social science 第三章以韦伯( maxweber )和戴维森( donalddavidson )的多元论思想为范本，从分析哲学的角度，借助现代国内外学者的成果，提出融贯三派的新建议，说明弱化的规律与弱化的规则相结合的可能性。
The composition doctrine declares that international commercial arbitration power are composed of certain elements of contractual power judicial power and autonomous characteristics , so this doctrine can be further divided into three unitary doctrines and three complex doctrines . the given disposition power doctrine believes internat 构成说认为，国际商事仲裁权的性质是由契约论、司法权论和自治论三种学说单独或组合而成，由此形成了三种单一论主张和三种混合多元论主张。
Around these 3 questions , the paper chooses respectively the representative delegates of different approaches : naturalism , antinaturalism , and pluralism . in this process , i focus on refuting the arguments which believe social laws are either impossible , impractical , or ungainable . finally , i aim to find a way to mitigate those arguments : to weaken the concept of laws to unify laws and rules , and by this way do i want to support the coexistence of different methodologies 本文以这三个问题为中心，挑选自然主义、反自然主义及多元论的几位典型代表人物的观点来展开论述，重点在于反驳坚持社会科学规律不存在、不实际或不可获得的观点，为化解关键争论找到一个途径：弱化“规律”概念，融规律与规则于一体，以期将此作为支持不同方法论的存在的突破口。
