The mutual aim of product liability laws in countries around the world is to protect consumers " rights as well as take into consideration of the benefits of manufactures " and sellers " 保护消费者利益，兼顾生产者、销售者的利益是世界各国产品责任法的共同追求。
And then the article analyzes the economic law character of this law and the relationship between the product recall law system and product liability law system 在此基础上，文章对产品召回法的经济法性质，以及它与产品责任法的关系等重要的一般性的法理问题作了详细而深入的论证。
But there is still a big difference in the development and perfection of the legislation in different countries . this thesis tries to compare the difference in the legislation on the duties of products and products " problem relating to it 本文试图作一次努力，就中外产品责任法在产品责任相关问题规定上的差异进行比较研究，以利于我国在立法上予以借鉴，希望有益于我国产品责任法更加科学化和规范化。
With regard to product liability law ' s legislation system , our country adopts the comprehensive legislation mode which combines together public and private laws without establishing independent product liability law while most other countries adopt to establish product liability laws independently 在产品责任立法体例方面，与国外大部分国家采取单独制定产品责任法的立法模式不同，我国没有制定单独的产品责任法，而采用的是公、私法合一的综合性立法模式。
The legislation on products is paid much attention to at present in all the countries . from the view of the law of product liability and its purpose , the consumers " rights are guaranteed by regulating the duties and services of the manufacturers and sellers 现代各国都很重视产品责任立法，从各国产品责任法的立法与宗旨来看，都是通过对生产者和销售者的产品责任和义务的规范，来维护消费者的合法权益的，但在立法的发展及完善程度上，各国间存在着较大差距。
According to the promises our nation took to enter wto , our country will continue to enlarge the foreign trade and this will lead to economic growth of our country . however , with the internationalization of manufacture and marketing , phenomena that products with defects produced in a country cause consumers " or users " personal damage or property loss in the importing country or a third country increases day by day . since there are many differences between the laws on product responsibility of different country , which will baffle our to develop foreign trade under wto rules as well as protect chinese consumers from products with defects , we must strengthen the research to the laws of product responsibility of other countries , especially the major nations of wto , and coordinate the relation between the law on product responsibility of our country and those of other countries , and , perfect the laws on product responsibility of our country 按照我国加入wto的承诺，我国将进一步扩大对外贸易，这对我国经济增长无疑是一种促进，但随着产品生产和销售的国际化，一国生产的缺陷产品在进口国甚至第三国导致消费者、使用者人身伤害、财产损失的现象也日渐增多，而各国的产品责任法又千差万别，这些法律冲突的存在会阻碍我国在wto规则下发展对外贸易，同时也不利于对我国消费者的保护，因此，我们必须加强对世界各国，尤其是wto主要成员国产品责任法律制度的研究，协调我国与各国产品责任法的关系，完善我国产品责任法律制度。
It consists of eight parts : from part one to part six the following are analysis and studies such as the definition and scope of products both at home and abroad , the definition and norms of judgement of the product defects , the imputation principle of pl , the subject of pl , the pl cause of counterplea , the compensation for damages of pl . etc . in part seven is a brief comparison between responsibility of quote and lawsuit limitation . and a conclusion is drawn from the above seven parts which will gives us some ideas about what we should learn and what will make it perfect for our pl 第一部分至第六部分依次就中外产品责任法中产品的定义和范围、产品缺陷的定义和判断标准、产品责任的归责原则、产品责任主体、产品责任的抗辩事由、产品责任的损害赔偿进行了比较研究并就以上各方面我国产品责任立法必须完善之处分别在各部分进行了阐述；第七部分就产品责任诉讼中的举证责任和诉讼时效进行了简略的比较；结语部分就上述七部分我国产品责任法的可供借鉴之处和完善进行了结论性的综述。
The emergence of strict liability is really a big development in products liability law . strict liability tends to protect consumers " interests in its value goal , but a country shall not only attach great importance to the protection of consumers " interests , but also give consideration to enterprises " interests while making and enforcing its products liability law 严格责任的产生的确是产品责任法的重大发展，它在价值目标上倾向于保护消费者的利益，但一个国家在制定和实施产品责任法时不仅要重视保护消费者的利益，而且也必须歉页企业的利益
There are still many problems that need to be solved in law , such as uncertainty of product ' s unreasonable dangerous scope , who should be responsible for the damage of products that accord with safety standards , whether to compensate for the damage of the products that are not for sale in circulation or not to do it , approval and imitation of mental compensation , establishment of punitive damage ' s system , etc . the author compared , discussed and analyzed the representative product liability laws of continental law system and anylo ? american law system , and explained product liability laws earlier rules and later legislation , furthermore , refining to some practical experiences and stylistic rules of european ? american product liability laws 本文拟主要采取比较法学的方法对现代英美法系和大陆法系几个主要代表性国家的产品责任法律规范学说进行比较、探讨、分析，并针对产品责任法早期的条例法和后期的立法予以阐释，借鉴欧美产品责任法中某些行之有效的实际经验和体例，分析了我国目前产品责任立法中关于产品、缺陷、损害以及缺陷与损害的因果关系等问题界定和解决中存在问题，进而提出了解决我国产品责任立法现实性与科学性矛盾的立法对策，应当制定专门的产品责任单行法突出其“民法性”特点。
About the expansion standard issue of the punitive damages applicable scope , the author proposes the viewpoint that we may enforce punitive damages to it as long as an illegal activity conforms to the essential elements of punitive damages , implements punitive damages to it can manifest the value of punitive damages , display the functions of punitive damages . the author also applied this viewpoint to analyze particularly , and proposed that the applicable scope expansion of punitive damages should be applied to the following fields of our country : product liability law , environmental law , securities law , copyright protection , vicious medical treatment accidents , the tort liability of harming others deliberately , anti - trust law 关于惩罚性赔偿适用范围扩张的标准问题,笔者提出一违法行为只要符合惩罚性赔偿的构成要件,对其实施惩罚性赔偿能够体现惩罚性赔偿的价值,发挥惩罚性赔偿的功能,就可以对其施以惩罚性赔偿的观点,并运用这一观点具体分析应将惩罚性赔偿扩张适用到我国的产品责任法、环境法、证券法、著作权保护、恶性医疗事故、故意伤害他人的侵权责任、反垄断法等领域。
