This article attempts to analyze the processing mechanism of the pure economic loss which comes to being in the system of civil law and anglo - america law system , summarizes characteristics of the processing mechanism and the policy consideration factor behind these processing mechanism , then carries on the discussion of the construction and the consummation of processing mechanism of the pure economic loss of our country , hopes to give my pygmy effort into the theory and the system of the pure economic loss in the our country 本文拟从纯粹经济损失赔偿制度的立法选择入手,分析大陆法系、英美法系各国基于各自法律传统与法律体系所形成的各具特色的纯粹经济损失赔偿制度,考察其立法选择背后更深层次的政策考量,分析对我国纯粹经济损失赔偿制度立法选择的借鉴意义。
Chinese corporations are characterized by high proportion of shares owned by states and corporations and the adoption of dltp can suit the status in quo and protects state shareholders " interests . but because of the influence of sequela of planned economy , wrongful application of organ principle and legal tradition of our nation , dltp is not accepted by our legislation . the author 由于计划经济的后遗症、对公司机关理论的不恰当运用‘以及我国重刑轻民的法律传统，除证券法以外，我国立法并无董事对第三人责任的规定，笔者认为，应修改相关立法，引入董事对第三人责任制度。
In the process of our country ' s judicial reform , there are many common grounds between the two countries in tradition of law ; and both countries face many common problems face many common problems in the process transforming from plan economic system to market economic system , finally , as developing countries , they are emulating the west advanced countries 中俄两国的法律传统有许多共同之处。目前两国都处于从计划经济体制向市场经济体制转轨的过程中，面临着许多共同问题。两国作为发展中国家，都在向西方发达国家学习。
It is the first time for our negotiable instrument law to cite this concept , which is a breakthrough to the tradition but also shows the weakness in the research system of the negotiable instrument consideration of our business law theorists . this dissertation has made systematic research regarding the negotiable instrument consideration system , and issued some personal ideas and opinions ; since this dissertation is based on many kinds of professional articles , literatures and thorough thought of the author , it will be helpful for the research regarding the negotiable instrument consideration . the first part concerns the general understanding of negotiable instruments consideration , setting up a basic theoretical skeleton on negotiable instruments consideration 但是由于英美法系与大陆法系在法律传统、法律理念上存在冲突,票据对价这一英美法上的概念,在采大陆法立法例的我国《票据法》中的适用,必然会产生“水土不服”的现象;而纵观我国票据法,关于票据对价的规定只有寥寥几条,我国的票据对价也没有十分完备的合同对价理论为基础,当票据对价出现了用现有法规和理论无法解决的难题时,在我国法律体系中无法找到可以比照的理论,以形成有效的解决方案,使票据对价无法充分发挥其制度功能。
