As different legal tradition , the continent law and anglo - american law have a big difference about the burden of proof of media defamation . the continent law regards it as common tort , it has profound theories about burden of proof . while the anglo - american law has a special defamation act 大陆法系将媒体侵害名誉权行为作为民法中侵权法的一般侵权来对待,在证明责任制度上具有深厚的理论作为指导,英美法系则有专门的诽谤法对其进行调整。
The confucian idea of valuing loyalty over money has existed for a long time and made a profound impact on the value orentation of chinese legal tradition , mainly in three aspects : obligation standard orientation in law standard , valuing agriculture over commerce and no lawsuit 摘要儒家的“重义轻利”观念由来已久，对中国法律传统的价值导向产生了深远影响，主要体现在三个方面：法本位上的义务本位取向，民商法领域的“重农抑商”传统和诉讼观上的“无讼”理想。
In china , under the influence of legal tradition and continental legal system , the evidence system pays more attention to substantive law rather than adjective law . in addition to the unscientific setting of the testimony standard , this evidence system influence the effect and quality of our country " s criminal trial 在我国，由于受传统法律思想和大陆法系证据制度的影响，重实体轻程序的审判思想积重难返，加之证明标准设置缺乏科学性，严重影响了我国刑事审判的效率和质量。
On the basis of the review of the legal tradition and governance condition of corporations of our country and comparison of legal environments for implementing independent - director system among china and uk and usa , this paper draws such a conclusion by adopting both legal and economic analysis methods : it is not feasible to introduce the independent - director system into china and it should not be a mandatory provision even if this system has to be provided in " company law " due to its significant status in law system 摘要文章通过考察我国公司的法律传统和治理现状，比较了我国与英美国家实施独立董事制度的法律环境，运用法律和经济学的分析方法，得出结论：我国在目前不宜引进独立董事制度，即使考虑其法律地位而在《公司法》有所规定，也不应该是强制性规定。
Part ii the observation and study on the general situation in common law countries and civil law countries . this article is to analyze the difference situation between them and to discuss the reason of it on the consideration of the different legal tradition and system foundation of the two 第二部分考察了证据关联性在英美法系国家、大陆法系国家证据法中的概况，并分析了它们之间存在的差异，然后，结合两大法系的法律传统及制度基础，探讨了证据关联性在两大法系中存在重大差异的原因所在。
Tn light of the deviation of culture tradition among nations , and the hamper initiated by the original legal tradition when china derivates investing fund , this article uses the comparative method to take foreign nations " advanced experiences for reference , and expound , combined with chinese internal situation , four issues , ranging in the name of investing fund , the trust contract structure of investing fund , the fiduciary duty of investing fund manager and the supervising system of investing fund , in that the whole article is divided into four parts : chapter i : the name of investment fund is a manifestation for the connotation of a country ' s investment fund ; therefore , a scientific name of investment fund could bring a good mutual effect to the whole investment fund system , which is essential to legislation and law enforcement of it 鉴于各国文化传统的差异，及我国在继受投资基金时将受到我国法律传统的阻扼，本文运用比较法学的方法以借鉴外国先进之经验，并在结合我国本土情况下对我国现行法制当中问题较为突出的投资基金的名称、投资基金的信托契约构造、投资基金管理人的信赖义务和投资基金监管体制四个问题进行探讨，由此全文分为四个部分：第一部分：投资基金名称是本国投资基金内涵的外在表征，而科学的投资基金名称能为整个投资基金制度的设计带来良性的互动，它对立法乃至法的执行至关重要。
This is because , the fact carrying out the run the country by law can solve the problem of the relative equilibrium between the government power and masses rights , however , it bounds a lot in real practice , especially could be restricted by china ' s historic and cultural customs , the legal tradition , the current policies and other aspects . and during the process of carrying out run the country by law , it also lacks the effective interaction between the government and the masses , and the mainly reason for this problem is that the masses are lacking of the correct understanding of the government power 这是因为，虽然推行“依法治国”事实上可以解决政府权力与民众权利的相对平衡问题，但是在现实操作中受到诸多条件限制，尤其是受我国历史文化习俗、法制传统及现行政策等制约，在推行“依法治国”中缺少政府与民众的有效“互动” ，而出现这个问题的主要原因是民众对政府权力缺乏正确的认识。
Restricted by many different factors , such as legal traditions , public order , criminal policies , purposes of criminal proceedings and criminal proceeding structures , specific countermeasures against it are quite different in different states , even if in the same state but in different periods 由于受法律文化传统、社会治安状况、刑事政策、刑事诉讼目的及其决定的刑事诉讼结构等多种因素的制约，不同国家甚至同一国家在不同历史时期对该问题的具体对策也各不相同。
