Seen from world criminal suit developing history , doctrine of function and power is in the trend of falling , while doctrine of part is rising obviously . to perfect the system of investigative interrogation of our country should consider the situation of our country 从世界范围的刑事诉讼发展历史看，职权主义明显处于衰退趋势，而当事人主义明显处于上升趋势。完善我国的刑事侦查讯问制度必须坚持从国情出发，从价值观上借鉴两大法系的合理因素，既重视实体真实和诉讼效率，又要注重讯问过程自身的价值。
Second chapter is the judge ’ s right of interpretation and civil action model for judge , and who has introduced the different models the circumstances of the judge ’ s right of interpretation , and the civil lawsystem model has clearly and definitely to stipulate , and the value is laid special emphasis on fai ; and the system of common law has similar judge , that the value is laid special emphasis on in the efficiency 第二部分为法官释明权与民事诉讼模式,介绍了不同模式的法官释明权的情况,大陆型当事人主义模式对释明权有明确规定,价值侧重于公平;英美型当事人主义模式中有类似法官释明权规定,价值侧重于效率。
In accordance with the circumstances of different people have different view about difficult enforcement , author analyses the three misunderstanding about difficult enforcement question from legal , hereby the author gets a accuracy legal orientation about difficult enforcement question . this article establishes an opinion of pursuit perfection of enforcement effect of carrying out independence value about procedure justice and implementing the procedure justice all the time in enforcement . then , this thesis analyses the reason of difficult enforcement ; point out it is inferior notion of legal system , stagnant system , insufficient of legislation , and flabby execution 针对执行难问题智者见智，仁者见仁的情况，笔者从法律的角度分析了对执行难问题认识的三种误区，从而给执行难问题一个正确的法律定位，树立在贯彻程序正义独立价值的前提下追求执行结果的完美，将程序正义贯穿于执行过程始终的观点；从法律角度分析了执行难产生的原因，即(法制)观念不强，体制不畅，立法不足，执法不严；从而为从法律上着手解决执行维问题打下基础，提出一些解决执行难问题的设想与建议，即应当树立的程序正义观念及当事人主义观念，执行权的归属及内部分权制约形式，执行机构的改革及对执行立法的建议等。
" plea bargaining " is the rather special system in american criminal procedure , which roots in the ideology of adversary system and " due process " . provided that the prosecutors have widespread discretion , conforming with the desire of settling dispute as soon as possible and complying with the international trend to quickly dispose the defendant , plea bargaining system has the rational connotation 辩诉交易是美国刑事诉讼中颇具特色的制度，根植于当事人主义和正当程序的理念中，实施于检察官充分裁量权条件下，符合人们渴望尽早解决纷争的心理，顺应对犯罪嫌疑人作出迅速处理的国际大趋势，有其合理的内核。
The theory base of the lawsuit of the enforcement trace to source the civil trial . the object of the lawsuit of the enforcement is maily set apart two : one is the disputes between excution creditor and the excution debtor about whether or not the debt has been set off ; postponed ; died out after the judgment of the debt . this course of the condition lies that the judgement is delayed the reality of the case . another condition is that the stranger proposes right to the excution target . this course of the condition lies that the judgement of adversely proceeding is different to the reality of the case . the lawsuit of the enforcement can adjust the difference and can make the judgement showing no difference to the reality 执行异议之诉处理的对象主要存在于两种情况下：一种是被执行人与申请执行人之间就执行依据所载权利在确定后是否已经消灭、延缓或者出现其他使执行受阻情况的争议，这种情况存在的根源在于诉讼所解决的事实争议相对于客观事实发展往往有着一定的滞后性；另一种是执行第三人对执行标的主张权利，与申请执行人、被执行人产生争议，这种情况出现的根源是诉讼中贯彻当事人主义所带来的认定事实与客观事实的偏差。
Firstly " the author makes a compared study on the concept of burden of proof in continental law system and anglo - american law system . then the author makes comments on the argument of the concept of burden of proof in china ' s theory field and tries to reconstruct the concept in china . the concept of burden of proof is in connection with structure of action 文章指出，证明责任的含义与诉讼结构有关，大陆法系职权主义刑事诉讼中的证明责任包括“形式的证明责任”和“实质的证明责任” ，而英美法系当事人主义刑事诉讼中的证明责任分为“提供证据责任”和“说服责任” 。
Author believes that comprehending of interpretation right should begin with the analysis the two different models of civil procedure . interpretation right derives from disparate legal traditions of disparate legal systems , has been fast connected with debate principle , and been one of the limitation and supply to the principle on the other hand 论述了释明权与民事诉讼模式的关系，释明权是对辩论主义的限制与补充，是当事人主义与职权主义的交错，它有效地发挥了两者的长处，克服了两者的弱点。
