Our village has a free children pleasure ground , stem from safe consideration to stipulate 1 . 1 meters of the following children must not be entered inside , my son just is 1 . 095 meters ( if put on the word of travel shoe , can achieve ) , we discuss with the administrator , the administrator agrees with a son to play , played good period of time , a day , it is another administrator is on duty , he lets the head the son played , when waiting for us to queue up to want to play again , because in front have a girl not quite tall , he does not let her play , seemed to i hope next the head looked a son up and down again , also did not let him play , i discuss to say to put on expensive shoe with him enough also , and safety is unchallenged also , but he holds to different idea , and say wait wore expensive shoe to play again , i feel son rights and interests got encroach , but husband says the family has a regulation , it is the someone said to calculate , it is you incorrect , who can help from the angle of law and human nature explain this problem 我们小区有个免费的儿童游乐场所，出于安全考虑规定1 . 1米以下的儿童不得入内，我儿子刚好是1 . 095米（假如穿上旅游鞋的话就能达到了） ，我们就跟治理员商量，治理员同意儿子玩，玩了好一段时间了，一天，是另一个治理员值班，头一次他让儿子玩了，等我们再一次排队想玩的时候，因为前面有一个女孩个不够高，他不让她玩，然后好象来了幸头又打量了儿子一下，也不让他玩了，我跟他商量说穿上高的鞋也够了，而且安全也不成问题了，但他坚持不同意，并且说等穿了高的鞋再来玩吧，我感到儿子权益受到了侵犯，但老公说人家有规定，是人家说了算，是你不对，有谁能从法律和人性的角度上帮忙解释一下这个问题吗？
