It is widely acknowledged that the crimes of commissions are violations of prohibitive stipulations and genuine crime of omissions are violations of commanding stipulations 众所周知，作为犯罪违反了刑法的禁止规范，纯正不作为犯罪如拒不执行判决裁定罪等违反了刑法的命令规范。
This paper has 2 parts ; the first part speaks of the base of the act - obligation about non - act crime , which is explained through two aspects , the obligation from essence and from form 具体而言,对“不作为犯罪之作为义务产生的根据”问题,本文从作为义务产生的实质根据和形式根据两个方面进行论述。
By means of the active obligation , we can expound the reasons of omission . moreover the active obligation makes it known that the crimes of omission " s fundamental fact and the elements " natural feature 通过作为义务，我们可以解释不作为的原因力，并且作为义务反映了不作为犯罪的基本事实和构成要素的本质特征。
Secondly , based on these , the writer talks about the active obligation " s significant position in the crimes of omission and its theon " setup , thinks the active obligation as one of the crimes of omission " s objectively constitutes 其次，笔者讨论了作为义务在不作为犯罪及其理论体系中的重要地位，认为作为义务是不作为犯罪的一个客观构成要件。
This paper talks about the base of act - obligation about non - act crime , and believe that taffic - action can lead to this act - obligation and some of the “ running away ” after traffic can be attributed to non - act crimes 本文论述了不作为犯的作为义务产生的根据,在此基础上认为交通肇事行为可以产生作为义务。交通肇事后逃逸的行为也有属于不作为犯罪的情形。
The article probes into the main respects of the active obligation , including its concept , the range of source , and determination , etc . the author expects that the research can arouse the theory circles having even more concerns on the theory of active obligation 本文主要针对不作为犯罪作为义务的概念、来源范围及认定等方面进行深入地探讨，期望能够引起学界对作为义务理论的更多关注。
The second pionts out that the traffic can lead to the act - obligation . scholars inside makes differet explanations about the meaning of “ death caused by running away ” . this paper argues that actor may be intentional for the death , also may be negligent for it . from the theory of non - act crime and the principle of the applicability among crime and liability and publishment , the meaning of “ death caused by running away ” should be divided into two parts , one belonging to non - act crime , the other belonging to aggrivated crime of traffic . on this base , it re - explain the meaning and nature of “ running away ” in criminal code article 133 provision and explanation 撇开罪刑法定原则,以不作为犯罪的刑法理论并结合罪责刑相适应原则为出发点,来理解“因逃逸致人死亡”的含义,可以把他分解为两部分,一部分属于不作为的故意犯罪,一部分属于交通肇事罪的加重犯。对因逃逸致人重伤的情形应全部归于不作为伤害罪。在此前提下,本文对刑法第一百三十三条及《解释》中出现的逃逸行为的性质及刑事责任作了论述。
Part iii , determination of the active obligation firstly , the significance of determining the active obligation is clarified by the article . by means of theory circles " analysis on method of the active obligation solving the problems of crimes of omission , the writer firmly believes that determining the active obligation can solve the problem of crimes of omission , and the method is feasible 第三部分作为义务的认定首先，文章阐明了对作为义务认定的意义。通过学界关于作为义务解决不作为犯罪的方法的分析，笔者认为认定作为义务可以解决不作为犯问题，用作为义务解决不作为犯罪问题的方法具有可行性。
Part ii , the source of the active obligation first of all , this section introduces the source of essence doctrine and formal doctrine in the sino - foreign criminal law theon " about the active obligation . based on the shape analyses of these formal and essence source , the source of the active obligation that the writer thinks ought to be the union of the formal and essence source , that is , on the one hand through probing into the norm kev element by form , the author thinks that the formal key element of the formal source is the following four sources : the statue source code is regulated demand in duties either the professional work the action before and the legal action . on the other hand , through the essence , the author probes the reasons of source and thinks that the essence key element is the doer " s exclusively controlling the legal right and interest confronted with pressing peril and depended on his action 第二部分作为义务的发生根据首先，本部分介绍了中外刑法理论中关于作为义务的形式来源学说和实质来源学说。在分析了形式来源和实质来源的基础上，笔者认为不作为犯罪作为义务的来源应当是形式来源和实质来源的统一，即：一方面从形式上探讨其规范的要素，认为不作为犯的作为义务来源的形式要素即我国刑法理论关于作为义务来源的四来源说：法律明文规定、职务或业务上的要求、先行行为及法律行为四种；另一方面从实质上探讨其存在根据，认为作为义务来源的实质要素是指行为人对处于紧急危险状态的法益的危险程度加剧或危险向危害结果的现实性转化具有排他性支配。
The writer sticks to the negative concept , thinking that the ethical obligation can not become the active obligation in our country " s theory of criminal law , the ground are : the morality obligation does not have statue nature the criterions of morality obligations have the uncertainty the action violating morality obligations should not undertake criminal responsibility the value of criminal law backs the negative concept 刑法理论界对此有肯定、否定和折中三种观点。笔者持否定观点，认为道德义务不能成为我国刑法理论中不作为犯罪作为义务的来源，理由是:道德义务不具有法律性质、道德义务的标准具有不确定性、违反道德义务不应该承担刑事责任、刑法的价值取向支持了否定说等。
