zediva造句

例句与造句

1. The plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction against Zediva.
2. Zediva purchased DVDs and " rented " them out to users one-by-one.
3. Zediva only rented DVD's to one customer at a time and did not make DVD copies.
4. Zediva was not licensed or authorized by the plaintiffs to distribute or perform any of the copyrighted works.
5. Zediva's service was thought to have a significant negative impact on the market for other licensed VOD providers.
6. It's difficult to find zediva in a sentence. 用zediva造句挺难的
7. It did not matter whether Zediva's customers were using the service at different times and in different places.
8. Zediva also argued that the system was " like playing back a movie from a DVD with a very long cable attached ".
9. Zediva argued that it serves a similar function as rental stores like Blockbuster who don't need a licensing agreement to rent movies.
10. The plaintiffs alleged that " Zediva's business was built on streaming performances of motion pictures, not the rental of discs ".
11. During October 2011, Zediva took down their DVD streaming service and agreed to pay $ 1.8 million to the Motion Picture Association.
12. In August 2011, the U . S . District court Judge John Walter ordered a preliminary injunction against Zediva, shutting down their service.
13. The defendants provided a service named Zediva which allowed customers to watch movies online by streaming the digital signal from physical DVD players housed in its data center.
14. Online movie start-up, Zediva . com, aimed to differentiate itself from competitors such as Netflix by streaming popular movies the day they came out on DVD for an extremely low price.
15. The court did not directly address Zediva's first sale argument, but law professor James Grimmelmann pointed out that " first sale is a defense only to the distribution and display rights ", irrelevant to the lawsuit based on the performance right.
16. Whether the place where Zediva's customers watched was public or not did not matter as much as the fact that the customers were " members of the public " . " The non-public nature of the place of the performance has no bearing on whether or not those who enjoy the performance constitute'the public'under the transmit clause ", stated the court.